TRUTH, RECONCILIATION, AND UNSETTLING SETTLER SPACES AND PLACES: AN AUTOETHNOGRAPHY

au.legacy.Downloads2314
au.legacy.Handlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10791/345
au.legacy.Views1280
au.legacy.contributor_advisorDr. Debra Hoven (Athabasca University)
au.legacy.contributor_otherDr. Janelle Baker (Athabasca University)
au.legacy.contributor_otherDr. Reinekke Lengelle (Athabasca University)
au.legacy.contributor_otherDr. Lindsay Morcom (Queens University)
dc.contributor.advisorHoven, Debra
dc.contributor.authorLoewen, David M.
dc.contributor.otherBaker, Janelle
dc.contributor.otherLengelle, Reinekke
dc.contributor.otherMorcom, Lindsay
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-22T19:11:39Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-02T18:29:43Z
dc.date.available2021-04-22T19:11:39Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-22
dc.descriptionMarch 15, 2021
dc.description.abstractIn late 2015, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) on Indian Residential Schools in Canada released its Final Report and 94 Calls to Action. The TRC laid out how Canada has enacted ongoing policies and practices of cultural genocide against Aboriginal peoples and communities. In a 2014 book outlining a proposed research agenda for online distance education, long-time researchers in the field, Zawacki-Richter and Anderson argued that social justice is always at the forefront for individual educators and institutions engaged in the field. The purpose of this critical qualitative inquiry was to test and reflect upon this argument, as well as reflect on my personal position within this frame. To do that, this study has been conducted through critical self-reflection upon my own privileges (white, male, Settler, etc.) framed by my experiences completing an online distance education doctoral program, in turn, interfacing these with my reading of the TRC reports and Calls to Action. This study was framed and conducted in this way, in order to examine whether social justice aspirations, such as for example the TRC Calls to Action, are at the forefront of educators and institutions engaged in online distance education, and not just glossy aspirational statements, otherwise referred to as bullshit (à la Frankfurt, 2005). The process and outcome of this study was guided by the narrative method of autoethnography, which is recognized as both process and product. This dissertation highlights some of that process, and the results represent the product. This autoethnographic research is based on one practitioner’s experiences – mine, a non-Indigenous, white, Settler, able-bodied, male in the geographic area currently called Canada. This is intermeshed with my experiences within online distance education, and more specifically the doctoral program that I have participated in since 2015, which specializes in the field of online education. This dissertation explores and reflects upon various tensioned interfaces through interrogating my white Settler privileges, along with broader Setter responsibilities and response-abilities articulated within the TRC Calls to Action and related processes. These include interfaces with the Indigenous-informed concepts of cultural safety, ethical space of engagement, and cultural interface.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2149/4059
dc.subjectonline learningen
dc.subjectTruth and Reconciliation Commissionen
dc.subjectdistance educationen
dc.subjectbullshiten
dc.subjectinterfacesen
dc.subjectautoethnographyen
dc.subjectsocial justiceen
dc.subjectSettleren
dc.subjectcultural safetyen
dc.subjectcultural interfaceen
dc.subjectethical spaceen
dc.titleTRUTH, RECONCILIATION, AND UNSETTLING SETTLER SPACES AND PLACES: AN AUTOETHNOGRAPHY
thesis.degree.disciplineCentre for Distance Education
thesis.degree.grantorAthabasca University
thesis.degree.levelDoctor of Education (EdD) in Distance Education

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LoewenTRUTHRECONCILIATIONANDUNSETTLINGSETTLERSPACESANDPLACESANAUTOETHNOGRAPHYOFPRIVILEGE.pdf
Size:
22.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format